<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85348</link>
    <description>A polishing wheel used in the manufacture of dry cell batteries was treated as a tool or appliance working with an electric motor, rather than as an eligible input or a part of the machine. Because the relevant Explanation to Rule 57A excluded tools and appliances, Modvat credit was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85348</link>
      <description>A polishing wheel used in the manufacture of dry cell batteries was treated as a tool or appliance working with an electric motor, rather than as an eligible input or a part of the machine. Because the relevant Explanation to Rule 57A excluded tools and appliances, Modvat credit was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>