<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 221 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for further consideration, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s order that held the appellants liable for duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act for violating EOU provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive assessment, considering the appellants&#039; arguments regarding their inability to export due to market conditions and their contention that they should not be treated as a 100% EOU. The decision highlighted discrepancies in allowing manufacturing under Section 65 of the Customs Act without imported raw materials and granted the appellants an opportunity for a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 221 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for further consideration, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s order that held the appellants liable for duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act for violating EOU provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive assessment, considering the appellants&#039; arguments regarding their inability to export due to market conditions and their contention that they should not be treated as a 100% EOU. The decision highlighted discrepancies in allowing manufacturing under Section 65 of the Customs Act without imported raw materials and granted the appellants an opportunity for a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>