<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant a rebate to the respondent under Section 22 of the Customs Act, 1962. The respondent&#039;s claim for refund of proportionate duty based on a survey conducted after clearance was initially rejected by the Assistant Collector but allowed on appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the Customs Department&#039;s duty to assess damaged goods under Section 22(3) and accepted the survey report&#039;s value determination. The survey conducted by the insurer&#039;s surveyors, despite not informing Customs Officers, was deemed reliable. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and granted the rebate claimed by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant a rebate to the respondent under Section 22 of the Customs Act, 1962. The respondent&#039;s claim for refund of proportionate duty based on a survey conducted after clearance was initially rejected by the Assistant Collector but allowed on appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the Customs Department&#039;s duty to assess damaged goods under Section 22(3) and accepted the survey report&#039;s value determination. The survey conducted by the insurer&#039;s surveyors, despite not informing Customs Officers, was deemed reliable. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and granted the rebate claimed by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>