<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 278 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85298</link>
    <description>Rule 57H transitional credit under the Central Excise MODVAT scheme was confined to the duty actually paid on inputs lying in stock before the declaration under Rule 57G was acknowledged. The text distinguishes this from Rule 57B, which granted higher notional credit for specified exempt-sector inputs to assessees already operating within the MODVAT scheme. For pre-declaration stock, the operative relief under Rule 57H was limited to actual duty-paid credit, and the higher notional credit under Rule 57B was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 278 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85298</link>
      <description>Rule 57H transitional credit under the Central Excise MODVAT scheme was confined to the duty actually paid on inputs lying in stock before the declaration under Rule 57G was acknowledged. The text distinguishes this from Rule 57B, which granted higher notional credit for specified exempt-sector inputs to assessees already operating within the MODVAT scheme. For pre-declaration stock, the operative relief under Rule 57H was limited to actual duty-paid credit, and the higher notional credit under Rule 57B was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>