<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 252 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85270</link>
    <description>Record bags were held not classifiable as cases under the specific tariff sub-heading for printed cartons, bags and cases, because the expression had to be read in its relevant commercial and contextual sense. The product was described as a cardboard cover used for gramophone records, but it was not shown to answer the tariff meaning of a case or packing container analogous to cartons and boxes. As it did not fall within the specific description, the residuary sub-heading applied, and the product was correctly classified there. The HSN reference to record sleeves also supported exclusion from the specific entry relied on by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 252 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85270</link>
      <description>Record bags were held not classifiable as cases under the specific tariff sub-heading for printed cartons, bags and cases, because the expression had to be read in its relevant commercial and contextual sense. The product was described as a cardboard cover used for gramophone records, but it was not shown to answer the tariff meaning of a case or packing container analogous to cartons and boxes. As it did not fall within the specific description, the residuary sub-heading applied, and the product was correctly classified there. The HSN reference to record sleeves also supported exclusion from the specific entry relied on by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>