<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85263</link>
    <description>Tungsten carbide pellets cleared without shank fitting were held not to be classifiable as tools or dies under Tariff Item 51A(iii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. The tariff entry was construed as covering complete tools and dies, including items such as wire drawing dies, extrusion dies and rock drilling bits, but not their parts or components. On the technical material, the pellet was only a component of a die and could function as a die only after fitting into a hard steel casing. Since the pellets were not independently a complete tool or die, they fell outside the tariff entry and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85263</link>
      <description>Tungsten carbide pellets cleared without shank fitting were held not to be classifiable as tools or dies under Tariff Item 51A(iii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. The tariff entry was construed as covering complete tools and dies, including items such as wire drawing dies, extrusion dies and rock drilling bits, but not their parts or components. On the technical material, the pellet was only a component of a die and could function as a die only after fitting into a hard steel casing. Since the pellets were not independently a complete tool or die, they fell outside the tariff entry and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>