<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 199 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of zinc ingots but remanded the case to the Additional Collector for reconsideration of the option to redeem the goods by paying a redemption fine and reassessment of penalties. The penalty on Inland Road Service was set aside due to lack of evidence of their knowledge of the goods being liable for confiscation. The condition of producing no objection certificates for the release of seized goods was also removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 199 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of zinc ingots but remanded the case to the Additional Collector for reconsideration of the option to redeem the goods by paying a redemption fine and reassessment of penalties. The penalty on Inland Road Service was set aside due to lack of evidence of their knowledge of the goods being liable for confiscation. The condition of producing no objection certificates for the release of seized goods was also removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>