<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 249 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal and proceeded to hear the case. However, the appeal was ultimately dismissed as the grinding of calcined bauxite and calcined china clay was not considered a process of manufacture under the new Tariff. The Tribunal found that the products did not acquire a distinct identity post-grinding, only undergoing a change in form for enhanced usability, which was insufficient to attract duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 249 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal and proceeded to hear the case. However, the appeal was ultimately dismissed as the grinding of calcined bauxite and calcined china clay was not considered a process of manufacture under the new Tariff. The Tribunal found that the products did not acquire a distinct identity post-grinding, only undergoing a change in form for enhanced usability, which was insufficient to attract duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>