<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, in favor of the respondents. The dispute centered on the duty on acrylic yarn processed by the respondents, with the Revenue alleging non-payment of Central Excise Duty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the yarn&#039;s properties post-processing, the lower authorities found in favor of the respondents due to lack of Department tests and denial of natural justice. The Tribunal upheld these findings, emphasizing the reliability of the test report and genuineness of the samples, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, in favor of the respondents. The dispute centered on the duty on acrylic yarn processed by the respondents, with the Revenue alleging non-payment of Central Excise Duty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the yarn&#039;s properties post-processing, the lower authorities found in favor of the respondents due to lack of Department tests and denial of natural justice. The Tribunal upheld these findings, emphasizing the reliability of the test report and genuineness of the samples, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>