<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 178 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were liable for excise duty on tetrapods used in construction, as they failed to inform authorities about manufacturing. The case was remanded for verification of documents on cement use, with Modvat credit to be granted upon verification. Penalties were set aside due to a genuine misunderstanding, and confiscation liability was remitted. The appeal was disposed of, and stay petitions were considered resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 178 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were liable for excise duty on tetrapods used in construction, as they failed to inform authorities about manufacturing. The case was remanded for verification of documents on cement use, with Modvat credit to be granted upon verification. Penalties were set aside due to a genuine misunderstanding, and confiscation liability was remitted. The appeal was disposed of, and stay petitions were considered resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>