<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85189</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 66/73-C.E. applied only to fresh unused steel melting scrap arising in an integrated ore-based steel plant, and steel ingots cleared from a factory not meeting that condition were therefore outside the notification. The duty demand was sustained. Penalty under Rule 173Q was based on the facts and circumstances, was found just and reasonable, and no ground for appellate interference was shown. The penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85189</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 66/73-C.E. applied only to fresh unused steel melting scrap arising in an integrated ore-based steel plant, and steel ingots cleared from a factory not meeting that condition were therefore outside the notification. The duty demand was sustained. Penalty under Rule 173Q was based on the facts and circumstances, was found just and reasonable, and no ground for appellate interference was shown. The penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>