<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85183</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was allowed where the declaration under Rule 57G did not specifically name electric motors as a final product, because the classification list and related correspondence already showed the assessee&#039;s intention to claim credit on the relevant inputs and outputs. The approved classification list expressly referred to electric motors, and its reverse noted that Modvat would be claimed on electric fans and motors. Prior intimation to the department reinforced that the disclosure requirement was substantially satisfied. On that basis, declaration in the classification list was treated as sufficient compliance, and denial of credit was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 168 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85183</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was allowed where the declaration under Rule 57G did not specifically name electric motors as a final product, because the classification list and related correspondence already showed the assessee&#039;s intention to claim credit on the relevant inputs and outputs. The approved classification list expressly referred to electric motors, and its reverse noted that Modvat would be claimed on electric fans and motors. Prior intimation to the department reinforced that the disclosure requirement was substantially satisfied. On that basis, declaration in the classification list was treated as sufficient compliance, and denial of credit was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>