<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 175 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85162</link>
    <description>Cutting oils, quenching oils and testing oils used merely as lubricants or process aids in manufacturing tractor and motor vehicle components do not qualify as &quot;raw materials&quot; or &quot;component parts&quot; for set-off credit under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. as amended. Applying the plain and popular meaning of those expressions, the goods must either serve as the starting material of manufacture or form part of the finished product; because the oils only facilitated machining, heat treatment and testing, they fell outside the notification. The amended notification was construed strictly, and the denial of set-off credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 175 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85162</link>
      <description>Cutting oils, quenching oils and testing oils used merely as lubricants or process aids in manufacturing tractor and motor vehicle components do not qualify as &quot;raw materials&quot; or &quot;component parts&quot; for set-off credit under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. as amended. Applying the plain and popular meaning of those expressions, the goods must either serve as the starting material of manufacture or form part of the finished product; because the oils only facilitated machining, heat treatment and testing, they fell outside the notification. The amended notification was construed strictly, and the denial of set-off credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>