<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85156</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT allowed the appeals filed by M/s. Hindustan Development Corporation Limited, challenging duty demands imposed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-l Collectorate. The dispute revolved around the inclusion of inspection charges in the assessable value of goods, specifically Railway Points and Crossing. The Tribunal held that the inspection charges paid by customers should not be included in the assessable value, citing precedents and evidence provided by the appellants. As a result, the duty demands were set aside, and the appeals were allowed on merit. The Tribunal did not address the issue of the extended period for issuing show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 276 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85156</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT allowed the appeals filed by M/s. Hindustan Development Corporation Limited, challenging duty demands imposed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-l Collectorate. The dispute revolved around the inclusion of inspection charges in the assessable value of goods, specifically Railway Points and Crossing. The Tribunal held that the inspection charges paid by customers should not be included in the assessable value, citing precedents and evidence provided by the appellants. As a result, the duty demands were set aside, and the appeals were allowed on merit. The Tribunal did not address the issue of the extended period for issuing show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>