<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision, confirming the invoice price of U.S. $0.87 per lb as the correct assessable value for imported almonds in shell under Section 14(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Department failed to provide evidence contradicting the invoice price or establishing undervaluation, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:33:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision, confirming the invoice price of U.S. $0.87 per lb as the correct assessable value for imported almonds in shell under Section 14(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Department failed to provide evidence contradicting the invoice price or establishing undervaluation, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>