<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 256 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed a de novo consideration by the lower authority to determine the correct manufacturer of the beedies and assess duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of addressing the root issue of duty payment responsibility and ensuring a fair adjudication process for the appellants. All aspects of the case were deemed open for reconsideration, highlighting the need for a thorough examination of the legal and factual elements involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 256 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed a de novo consideration by the lower authority to determine the correct manufacturer of the beedies and assess duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of addressing the root issue of duty payment responsibility and ensuring a fair adjudication process for the appellants. All aspects of the case were deemed open for reconsideration, highlighting the need for a thorough examination of the legal and factual elements involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>