<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85109</link>
    <description>Where separately assessed polypropylene bags and slings were included in the invoice price of cement bags without a distinct value, their value had to be excluded from the assessable value of the cement bags to prevent double levy. On that basis, excess duty paid on the cement bags was refundable. Duty separately paid on the polypropylene bags and slings, however, remained payable and was not refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:37:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85109</link>
      <description>Where separately assessed polypropylene bags and slings were included in the invoice price of cement bags without a distinct value, their value had to be excluded from the assessable value of the cement bags to prevent double levy. On that basis, excess duty paid on the cement bags was refundable. Duty separately paid on the polypropylene bags and slings, however, remained payable and was not refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>