<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85108</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected, confirming the lower authorities&#039; decision to assess the vessel at U.S. $96 per LDT for customs duty purposes. The remission of duty was granted for the full value of stolen goods amounting to Rs. 7,05,000. The claims for depreciation and reconditioning costs of the vessel were dismissed as irrelevant for assessing a vessel meant for scrapping. The lower authorities&#039; approach and assessment were upheld as correct and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85108</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected, confirming the lower authorities&#039; decision to assess the vessel at U.S. $96 per LDT for customs duty purposes. The remission of duty was granted for the full value of stolen goods amounting to Rs. 7,05,000. The claims for depreciation and reconditioning costs of the vessel were dismissed as irrelevant for assessing a vessel meant for scrapping. The lower authorities&#039; approach and assessment were upheld as correct and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>