<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85086</link>
    <description>Marketability is a prerequisite for tariff classification, so crushed fruit products must be shown to be in a marketable condition before classification can be sustained. The applicability of the disputed sub-heading also depends on whether the goods were packed in a unit container designed to hold a pre-determined quantity or number, which requires factual verification of the packing. Classification under Chapter 8 further depends on whether the product continues to answer the tariff description of edible fruit after crushing and addition of preservatives. Where these factual and tariff-description issues remain unresolved, the proper course is de novo reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85086</link>
      <description>Marketability is a prerequisite for tariff classification, so crushed fruit products must be shown to be in a marketable condition before classification can be sustained. The applicability of the disputed sub-heading also depends on whether the goods were packed in a unit container designed to hold a pre-determined quantity or number, which requires factual verification of the packing. Classification under Chapter 8 further depends on whether the product continues to answer the tariff description of edible fruit after crushing and addition of preservatives. Where these factual and tariff-description issues remain unresolved, the proper course is de novo reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>