<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85077</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57H was treated as allowable where an application for permission had been made and no refusal had been recorded. The phrase &quot;may allow&quot; was read as requiring the Assistant Collector to examine the prescribed conditions, but not as making prior permission an absolute precondition in every case. Permission could not be withheld without valid reasons or delayed unreasonably, and availment of credit in anticipation of permission was not invalid merely because formal approval had not yet issued. On that basis, the denial of credit was set aside and the assessee&#039;s credit claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85077</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57H was treated as allowable where an application for permission had been made and no refusal had been recorded. The phrase &quot;may allow&quot; was read as requiring the Assistant Collector to examine the prescribed conditions, but not as making prior permission an absolute precondition in every case. Permission could not be withheld without valid reasons or delayed unreasonably, and availment of credit in anticipation of permission was not invalid merely because formal approval had not yet issued. On that basis, the denial of credit was set aside and the assessee&#039;s credit claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>