<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85050</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s order due to the violation of natural justice in denying cross-examination of a co-noticee and the non-consideration of crucial evidence. The tribunal emphasized the importance of a fair hearing and remanded the case for a thorough examination of documentary evidence, allowing both appeals to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85050</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s order due to the violation of natural justice in denying cross-examination of a co-noticee and the non-consideration of crucial evidence. The tribunal emphasized the importance of a fair hearing and remanded the case for a thorough examination of documentary evidence, allowing both appeals to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>