<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified its order, granting a total stay on duty recovery and waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appellants. It acknowledged the permissibility of multiple prices for different regions based on commercial criteria, supported by cited judgments. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration within three months, emphasizing the need for a fair review in light of legal precedents presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified its order, granting a total stay on duty recovery and waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appellants. It acknowledged the permissibility of multiple prices for different regions based on commercial criteria, supported by cited judgments. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration within three months, emphasizing the need for a fair review in light of legal precedents presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>