<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 135 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay for filing appeals related to damaged goods. The car was confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962, due to exceeding the import period. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s efforts, the confiscation was upheld. However, the Tribunal allowed re-export of the car upon payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 25,000, emphasizing the need for authorities to provide clear guidance to avoid such situations in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 135 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay for filing appeals related to damaged goods. The car was confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962, due to exceeding the import period. Despite acknowledging the appellant&#039;s efforts, the confiscation was upheld. However, the Tribunal allowed re-export of the car upon payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 25,000, emphasizing the need for authorities to provide clear guidance to avoid such situations in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>