<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84945</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the classification of the product &#039;Air Dryer&#039; under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal to classify it under Item 29A(i) as a Refrigerating appliance. The Tribunal emphasized the product&#039;s function of removing moisture from compressed air for industrial use, noting its operational characteristics and legal precedents. It agreed with the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) that the product did not qualify as a refrigerating appliance under the Tariff, referencing dictionary definitions and previous court decisions. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the initial classification decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84945</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT upheld the classification of the product &#039;Air Dryer&#039; under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal to classify it under Item 29A(i) as a Refrigerating appliance. The Tribunal emphasized the product&#039;s function of removing moisture from compressed air for industrial use, noting its operational characteristics and legal precedents. It agreed with the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) that the product did not qualify as a refrigerating appliance under the Tariff, referencing dictionary definitions and previous court decisions. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the initial classification decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>