<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders, and held that the price of optional accessories should not be included in the assessable value of vacuum cleaners. The issue of limitation and penalties was not specifically addressed due to the success of the appeals on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders, and held that the price of optional accessories should not be included in the assessable value of vacuum cleaners. The issue of limitation and penalties was not specifically addressed due to the success of the appeals on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>