<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84922</link>
    <description>Uncleared imported cargo may be disposed of by tender sale under the governing port statute where the importer has been repeatedly notified and given adequate opportunity to clear the goods. Payment of port charges does not confer a right to keep cargo indefinitely in port premises, and compliance with the statutory scheme was accepted on the facts. A writ court will not ordinarily upset such a sale on disputed allegations of undervaluation or mala fides, and alleged absence of customs permission was rejected where the applicable circular-based procedure was followed. The writ petition was dismissed and the auction purchaser&#039;s title was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84922</link>
      <description>Uncleared imported cargo may be disposed of by tender sale under the governing port statute where the importer has been repeatedly notified and given adequate opportunity to clear the goods. Payment of port charges does not confer a right to keep cargo indefinitely in port premises, and compliance with the statutory scheme was accepted on the facts. A writ court will not ordinarily upset such a sale on disputed allegations of undervaluation or mala fides, and alleged absence of customs permission was rejected where the applicable circular-based procedure was followed. The writ petition was dismissed and the auction purchaser&#039;s title was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>