<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 195 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the use of the logo &quot;Health&quot; on &quot;Tetracycline Capsules&quot; did not establish a proprietary relationship between the medicine and the manufacturer. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and concluded that the classification of the goods under Chapter sub-heading No. 3003.10 was incorrect. The appeal by the appellant firm was allowed, providing them with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:40:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 195 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the use of the logo &quot;Health&quot; on &quot;Tetracycline Capsules&quot; did not establish a proprietary relationship between the medicine and the manufacturer. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and concluded that the classification of the goods under Chapter sub-heading No. 3003.10 was incorrect. The appeal by the appellant firm was allowed, providing them with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>