<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84900</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Additional Collector of Customs&#039; order, emphasizing the need to fulfill export obligations in terms of both quantity and value for duty exemption. The appellants&#039; failure to prove the utilization of the imported material resulted in the dismissal of their appeal. Additionally, a reduced penalty was imposed for contravening customs regulations, despite the appellants&#039; arguments against it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 157 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84900</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Additional Collector of Customs&#039; order, emphasizing the need to fulfill export obligations in terms of both quantity and value for duty exemption. The appellants&#039; failure to prove the utilization of the imported material resulted in the dismissal of their appeal. Additionally, a reduced penalty was imposed for contravening customs regulations, despite the appellants&#039; arguments against it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>