<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 143 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84886</link>
    <description>Regulators fitted externally to ceiling fans were treated as indispensable components because the decisive test was whether the fan could be marketed without the regulator, not whether it could mechanically operate without it. Since the fans were cleared from the factory gate only with regulators, the regulators were held to be used in relation to manufacture of the final product. MODVAT credit on the regulators was therefore admissible, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 143 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84886</link>
      <description>Regulators fitted externally to ceiling fans were treated as indispensable components because the decisive test was whether the fan could be marketed without the regulator, not whether it could mechanically operate without it. Since the fans were cleared from the factory gate only with regulators, the regulators were held to be used in relation to manufacture of the final product. MODVAT credit on the regulators was therefore admissible, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>