<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application in a case involving non-compliance with exemption conditions, emphasizing the need to safeguard revenue interest. The appellants faced demands of Rs. 11,02,18,177 but could not commence production despite installing imported goods due to financial difficulties. The Tribunal refused to grant further time, requiring the demanded amount to be deposited within three months to avoid appeal dismissal. The case involved complex issues such as goods hypothecation and the precedence of tax recovery over other dues, with uncertainties regarding BIFR and liquidation proceedings adding to the complexity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:18:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the stay application in a case involving non-compliance with exemption conditions, emphasizing the need to safeguard revenue interest. The appellants faced demands of Rs. 11,02,18,177 but could not commence production despite installing imported goods due to financial difficulties. The Tribunal refused to grant further time, requiring the demanded amount to be deposited within three months to avoid appeal dismissal. The case involved complex issues such as goods hypothecation and the precedence of tax recovery over other dues, with uncertainties regarding BIFR and liquidation proceedings adding to the complexity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>