<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84867</link>
    <description>Durable, returnable cylinders used for packing liquid chlorine were treated as packing containers within Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944, so the proportionate cost recovered in instalments on the basis of the cylinders&#039; life was not part of the assessable value. The packing cost recovered per metric tonne was therefore excluded from valuation, and the appeal succeeded on that issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84867</link>
      <description>Durable, returnable cylinders used for packing liquid chlorine were treated as packing containers within Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944, so the proportionate cost recovered in instalments on the basis of the cylinders&#039; life was not part of the assessable value. The packing cost recovered per metric tonne was therefore excluded from valuation, and the appeal succeeded on that issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>