https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84866 In a customs classification dispute over polyols, the Tribunal applied judicial propriety and held that the Assistant Commissioner should have followed an earlier Tribunal ruling on the identical issue. The earlier ruling had classified the goods under Chapter Heading 3801 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Chapter 39. Because that precedent governed the matter and had not been distinguished or overturned, the Department's request for stay of the impugned order was rejected and no interim relief was granted. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:10:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84866 In a customs classification dispute over polyols, the Tribunal applied judicial propriety and held that the Assistant Commissioner should have followed an earlier Tribunal ruling on the identical issue. The earlier ruling had classified the goods under Chapter Heading 3801 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Chapter 39. Because that precedent governed the matter and had not been distinguished or overturned, the Department's request for stay of the impugned order was rejected and no interim relief was granted. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84866