<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 150 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84865</link>
    <description>The importability of hypodermic disposable syringes under the relevant import policy was treated as an interpretive controversy, not a purely factual matter. Noting that a coordinating Bench had taken a different view on the same issue, the Tribunal held that the dispute raised a question of law fit for reference under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The question was therefore referred to the Supreme Court under that provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 150 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84865</link>
      <description>The importability of hypodermic disposable syringes under the relevant import policy was treated as an interpretive controversy, not a purely factual matter. Noting that a coordinating Bench had taken a different view on the same issue, the Tribunal held that the dispute raised a question of law fit for reference under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The question was therefore referred to the Supreme Court under that provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>