<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 136 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84851</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied solely because subsidiary gate passes were issued after 1-4-1994 where the original gate pass had been issued on 31-3-1994 and invoices were produced during the transitional period. Notification No. 16/94 treated subsidiary gate passes as valid documents for credit, subject to the relevant issue-and-use conditions, and the tribunal noted that the documents were generated within a reasonable time. The appellate authority erred by rejecting credit only on the date of the subsidiary gate passes without examining the invoices or the Board&#039;s relaxation for the transitional period. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of those documents and instructions after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 136 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84851</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied solely because subsidiary gate passes were issued after 1-4-1994 where the original gate pass had been issued on 31-3-1994 and invoices were produced during the transitional period. Notification No. 16/94 treated subsidiary gate passes as valid documents for credit, subject to the relevant issue-and-use conditions, and the tribunal noted that the documents were generated within a reasonable time. The appellate authority erred by rejecting credit only on the date of the subsidiary gate passes without examining the invoices or the Board&#039;s relaxation for the transitional period. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of those documents and instructions after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>