<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the ex-factory price for ignition coils sold by the assessee should be based on the price charged to main dealers, not smaller dealers at depots. The authorities initially considered the main concerns as related persons and assessed the value based on the smaller dealers&#039; discount. However, the Tribunal clarified that the factory gate price, which included a 35% discount to main dealers, should be used for valuation purposes for all sales. The Tribunal upheld the validity of offering different discounts and found the extra discount to main dealers non-discriminatory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the ex-factory price for ignition coils sold by the assessee should be based on the price charged to main dealers, not smaller dealers at depots. The authorities initially considered the main concerns as related persons and assessed the value based on the smaller dealers&#039; discount. However, the Tribunal clarified that the factory gate price, which included a 35% discount to main dealers, should be used for valuation purposes for all sales. The Tribunal upheld the validity of offering different discounts and found the extra discount to main dealers non-discriminatory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>