<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84838</link>
    <description>An exemption notification applicable to hydraulic leather shaving machines was held to extend to leather shaving blades designed for use with those machines. The duty entry for the blades was linked to the rate applicable to the machine or mechanical appliance with which the cutting blade was designed to operate, so the benefit could not be denied merely because the imported goods were blades rather than the complete machine. The cited precedent supported this interpretation, and the denial of exemption was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84838</link>
      <description>An exemption notification applicable to hydraulic leather shaving machines was held to extend to leather shaving blades designed for use with those machines. The duty entry for the blades was linked to the rate applicable to the machine or mechanical appliance with which the cutting blade was designed to operate, so the benefit could not be denied merely because the imported goods were blades rather than the complete machine. The cited precedent supported this interpretation, and the denial of exemption was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>