<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 177 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84837</link>
    <description>Photo film consumed within the factory to adjust camera parameters, eliminate distortion and determine least count qualified as material used in relation to manufacture. The film was treated as part of the manufacturing process, not as a mere post-manufacture quality check, because it was necessary to make the semi-automatic camera marketable. On that basis, the film was held eligible for MODVAT credit and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 177 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84837</link>
      <description>Photo film consumed within the factory to adjust camera parameters, eliminate distortion and determine least count qualified as material used in relation to manufacture. The film was treated as part of the manufacturing process, not as a mere post-manufacture quality check, because it was necessary to make the semi-automatic camera marketable. On that basis, the film was held eligible for MODVAT credit and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>