https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84821 An appeal dismissed for non-prosecution was restored under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 where the appellant showed a bona fide failure to appear on the hearing date. The absence arose from a proxy advocate's failure to communicate the date in time, which was treated as a genuine inadvertent lapse. As the explanation was accepted and the respondent did not oppose restoration, the appellant was not made to suffer for the communication error and the appeal was restored. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:14:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84821 An appeal dismissed for non-prosecution was restored under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 where the appellant showed a bona fide failure to appear on the hearing date. The absence arose from a proxy advocate's failure to communicate the date in time, which was treated as a genuine inadvertent lapse. As the explanation was accepted and the respondent did not oppose restoration, the appellant was not made to suffer for the communication error and the appeal was restored. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84821