<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84819</link>
    <description>Where an ex parte order was passed without effective service of the hearing notice, the Tribunal exercised its inherent powers to secure substantial justice and recalled the order. The notice had been sent to the appellant&#039;s old address, so the appellant was not given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings. The matter was therefore restored for fresh hearing and directed to be decided again after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 202 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84819</link>
      <description>Where an ex parte order was passed without effective service of the hearing notice, the Tribunal exercised its inherent powers to secure substantial justice and recalled the order. The notice had been sent to the appellant&#039;s old address, so the appellant was not given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings. The matter was therefore restored for fresh hearing and directed to be decided again after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>