https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84812 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of exemption under Notification 175/86 to the appellants. The Tribunal held that the appellants did not contravene para 7 of the Notification by invoicing goods under the 'Sintex' brand without physically affixing the brand name. As the goods lacked the actual brand name, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in violation of the Notification, thereby granting them relief from penalties and confiscation of goods. en-us Mon, 05 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:57:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84812 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of exemption under Notification 175/86 to the appellants. The Tribunal held that the appellants did not contravene para 7 of the Notification by invoicing goods under the 'Sintex' brand without physically affixing the brand name. As the goods lacked the actual brand name, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were not in violation of the Notification, thereby granting them relief from penalties and confiscation of goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84812