https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84800 The Tribunal held the respondent liable for the duty demand on lots manufactured on the date of sample drawal and stock available that day, as per sample results. The case involved a dispute over the period of demand despite a variation in yarn count, with the Tribunal seeking clarification from the High Court. Additionally, a cross-reference questioned duty demand for goods in stock before the sample drawal, leading to the Tribunal referring the matter to the High Court for resolution. The judgment focused on addressing duty demands based on sample results and sought further interpretation from the High Court on related legal issues. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:18:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84800 The Tribunal held the respondent liable for the duty demand on lots manufactured on the date of sample drawal and stock available that day, as per sample results. The case involved a dispute over the period of demand despite a variation in yarn count, with the Tribunal seeking clarification from the High Court. Additionally, a cross-reference questioned duty demand for goods in stock before the sample drawal, leading to the Tribunal referring the matter to the High Court for resolution. The judgment focused on addressing duty demands based on sample results and sought further interpretation from the High Court on related legal issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84800