https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84798 The appeal centered on the classification of the appellant's product as Kraft Paper or Mill Board. The appellant argued for Kraft Paper classification, while the Collector disagreed. Allegations of procedural unfairness, disproportionate penalties, and misinterpretation of evidence were raised. The tribunal criticized the Collector's handling of evidence and ordered a remand to address the discrepancies and issues identified, indicating potential flaws in the original decision-making process. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:13:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84798 The appeal centered on the classification of the appellant's product as Kraft Paper or Mill Board. The appellant argued for Kraft Paper classification, while the Collector disagreed. Allegations of procedural unfairness, disproportionate penalties, and misinterpretation of evidence were raised. The tribunal criticized the Collector's handling of evidence and ordered a remand to address the discrepancies and issues identified, indicating potential flaws in the original decision-making process. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84798