https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84796 The Tribunal found that the order issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh lacked jurisdiction and validity due to discrepancies between the draft and final orders, procedural irregularities, and the adjudicating officer's failure to appear. Contempt proceedings against the officer were stayed, and the Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, setting aside the impugned order. The majority opinion concluded that the orders received were invalid, requiring fresh adjudication by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:06:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84796 The Tribunal found that the order issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh lacked jurisdiction and validity due to discrepancies between the draft and final orders, procedural irregularities, and the adjudicating officer's failure to appear. Contempt proceedings against the officer were stayed, and the Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, setting aside the impugned order. The majority opinion concluded that the orders received were invalid, requiring fresh adjudication by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84796