<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 228 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84793</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. required registration as a small scale industry with the prescribed authority as the general condition for eligibility. Paragraph 4(a) applied only where clearances in the relevant year did not exceed the prescribed limit, and paragraph 4(b) covered a separate contingency; neither provision created a continuing entitlement once turnover crossed the limit. Prior benefit under paragraph 4(a) did not extend exemption into later years after the threshold was exceeded, and paragraph 4(b) could not be invoked merely because the assessee had earlier enjoyed relief under paragraph 4(a). The exemption was therefore unavailable without an SSI certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 228 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84793</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. required registration as a small scale industry with the prescribed authority as the general condition for eligibility. Paragraph 4(a) applied only where clearances in the relevant year did not exceed the prescribed limit, and paragraph 4(b) covered a separate contingency; neither provision created a continuing entitlement once turnover crossed the limit. Prior benefit under paragraph 4(a) did not extend exemption into later years after the threshold was exceeded, and paragraph 4(b) could not be invoked merely because the assessee had earlier enjoyed relief under paragraph 4(a). The exemption was therefore unavailable without an SSI certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>