<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 171 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84782</link>
    <description>Finished goods must be entered in RG-1 as soon as manufacture is complete; post-manufacture grading and sticker affixation do not defer that recording duty. Goods found in a bonded store room without corresponding RG-1 entries were treated as manufactured goods, so non-compliance with the statutory stock record requirement attracted liability under Rule 173Q(1)(b). A plea that the lapse was bona fide or without mens rea was not accepted as a complete defence to breach of statutory records, though such circumstances may have only a mitigating effect. Confiscation and personal penalty were therefore sustained on the basis of the record-keeping contravention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:21:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 171 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84782</link>
      <description>Finished goods must be entered in RG-1 as soon as manufacture is complete; post-manufacture grading and sticker affixation do not defer that recording duty. Goods found in a bonded store room without corresponding RG-1 entries were treated as manufactured goods, so non-compliance with the statutory stock record requirement attracted liability under Rule 173Q(1)(b). A plea that the lapse was bona fide or without mens rea was not accepted as a complete defence to breach of statutory records, though such circumstances may have only a mitigating effect. Confiscation and personal penalty were therefore sustained on the basis of the record-keeping contravention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>