<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84779</link>
    <description>The appeal against the Collector of Customs (Appeals) order rejecting a refund claim for imported Zinc Ash from smelting operations under Notification No. 104/73-C.E. was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the original assessment under Notification No. 238/78-Cus. was correct, emphasizing the importance of timely submission of supporting documents. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments and certificates, the Tribunal ruled that the lack of proof regarding the origin of Zinc Ash during the initial assessment stage hindered their refund claim. The appeal was rejected, affirming the validity of the original assessment under Notification No. 238/78-Cus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84779</link>
      <description>The appeal against the Collector of Customs (Appeals) order rejecting a refund claim for imported Zinc Ash from smelting operations under Notification No. 104/73-C.E. was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the original assessment under Notification No. 238/78-Cus. was correct, emphasizing the importance of timely submission of supporting documents. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments and certificates, the Tribunal ruled that the lack of proof regarding the origin of Zinc Ash during the initial assessment stage hindered their refund claim. The appeal was rejected, affirming the validity of the original assessment under Notification No. 238/78-Cus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>