<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the conversion of wire into coils by the respondent did not amount to &quot;manufacture&quot; attracting excise duty. It emphasized that the process involved did not constitute manufacturing under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Assistant Collector and Collector (Appeals), remanding the cases for further proceedings to properly examine the matter. The appeals were allowed, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 181 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the conversion of wire into coils by the respondent did not amount to &quot;manufacture&quot; attracting excise duty. It emphasized that the process involved did not constitute manufacturing under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Assistant Collector and Collector (Appeals), remanding the cases for further proceedings to properly examine the matter. The appeals were allowed, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>