https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84764 Classification of an imported camera body depended on its presentation with micro-photographic apparatus components. Although the camera could independently function and retained the essential character of a camera without its lens, Chapter 90 Note 2 and Rule 2(a) did not require separate classification where it was simultaneously presented with an adaptor, cable release and microscope tube. The components demonstrated its role in a microphotographic assembly capable of temporary attachment to a conventional microscope. The camera body was therefore treated as part of micro-photographic apparatus under Heading 90.11/12 rather than as a separately presented camera under Heading 90.07. en-us Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:33:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84764 Classification of an imported camera body depended on its presentation with micro-photographic apparatus components. Although the camera could independently function and retained the essential character of a camera without its lens, Chapter 90 Note 2 and Rule 2(a) did not require separate classification where it was simultaneously presented with an adaptor, cable release and microscope tube. The components demonstrated its role in a microphotographic assembly capable of temporary attachment to a conventional microscope. The camera body was therefore treated as part of micro-photographic apparatus under Heading 90.11/12 rather than as a separately presented camera under Heading 90.07. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84764