<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the rejection of the adjournment request based on illness was unjust and violated principles of natural justice. The lower authority&#039;s order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, with both Judges agreeing that the adjournment request should have been granted due to genuine reasons presented. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fair hearing procedures and considering valid grounds for adjournment requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 146 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the rejection of the adjournment request based on illness was unjust and violated principles of natural justice. The lower authority&#039;s order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, with both Judges agreeing that the adjournment request should have been granted due to genuine reasons presented. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fair hearing procedures and considering valid grounds for adjournment requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>