<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 157 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84722</link>
    <description>The judgment required specific deposits for the applicants to proceed with their appeals on merits. M/s. Nova Dyestuff I. P. Ltd. and M/s. Blue Chips Chemicals Ltd. were mandated significant deposits, while M/s. Manish Marketing was exempt from duty but had a penalty to pay. The plant and machinery of M/s. Nova Dyestuff I. P. Ltd. were ordered for confiscation but could be redeemed upon payment of a fine. The court found discrepancies in the allegations against M/s. Manish Marketing and the manufacturing units unfounded, leading to a direction for the applicants to furnish a personal bond covering duty and penalties within a specified period to avoid dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 157 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84722</link>
      <description>The judgment required specific deposits for the applicants to proceed with their appeals on merits. M/s. Nova Dyestuff I. P. Ltd. and M/s. Blue Chips Chemicals Ltd. were mandated significant deposits, while M/s. Manish Marketing was exempt from duty but had a penalty to pay. The plant and machinery of M/s. Nova Dyestuff I. P. Ltd. were ordered for confiscation but could be redeemed upon payment of a fine. The court found discrepancies in the allegations against M/s. Manish Marketing and the manufacturing units unfounded, leading to a direction for the applicants to furnish a personal bond covering duty and penalties within a specified period to avoid dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>